Daniel Roy Greenfeld

Daniel Roy Greenfeld

About | Articles | Books | Jobs | News | Tags

pytest: no-boilerplate testing

When I first encountered Holger Krekel's pytest this summer on Jeff Knupp's blog I felt like I had been living under a rock for years. I've been using Python's unittest framework since 2006 and nose to find tests since 2008, but here was another test framework that actually predates nose! pytest is a very mature testing tool for testing Python. My favorite features:

  • It can run unittest, doctest, and nose, style tests suites, making it ideal for new and legacy projects.
  • It includes an intuitively named raises context manager for testing exceptions.
  • You can define fixture arguments to generate baseline data. This is very, very different from Django-style fixtures.
  • Via pytest.ini you can change the behavior of pytest.
  • Integrates nicely with setup.py.

Alright, lets dive into usage.

Test Discovery

The first thing that pytest provides is test discovery. Like nose, starting from the directory where it is run, it will find any Python module prefixed with test_ and will attempt to run any defined unittest or function prefixed with test_. pytest explores properly defined Python packages, searching recursively through directories that include __init__.py modules. Since an image is probably easier to read, here's a sample directory structure annotated with which files are checked for tests:

    test_envelope.py # checked for tests
    test_geo.py # checked for tests
    # pytest WON'T look here because it lacks __init__.py
    test_records.py # skipped because records/ lacks __init__.py
test_main.py  # checked for tests

Now that I've explained which files are checked for tests, here is how pytest determines what in each Python module is run as a test.

  1. pytest just runs doctests and unittests.
  2. pytest runs any function prefixed with test_ as a test.
  3. pytest does its best to run tests written for nose.

Yes, pytest behaves similarly to nose in test discovery. Next is another feature that it shares with nose that I really enjoy.

Writing Tests as Functions

Python's unittest framework works, but it's always felt like too much boilerplate. I admit I like to write tests, but working with the unittest framework always dimmed that fun. I suppose this is why the assert keyword is useful, because it changes this:

import unittest

class TestMyStuff(unittest.TestCase):

    def test_the_obvious(self):
        self.assertEqual(True, True)

if __name__ == '__main__':

to this:

>>> assert True == True

The former is nine lines of code (seven if you are using pytest to find this test) to do what the assert statement does in one. However, the nine lines of unittest code has a couple major advantages:

  1. Not automatically run when stumbled on by the Python interpreter.
  2. Produces a more illuminating response than an uninformative AssertionError.

Fortunately, tools like pytest (and nose) provide the ability to write tests as functions. This means we can combine the advantages of both unittest and assert thus:

def test_the_obvious():
    assert True == True

Now we are down to just two lines of code! That could be increased to five if we called pytest the same as we did in the unittest example:

import pytest

def test_the_obvious():
    assert True == True

if __name__ == '__main__':

The next part is wonderful. If an assert statement fails, then pytest provides a very informative response. Let's check it out by running the following code:

import pytest

def test_gonna_fail():
    assert True == False  # Going to fail here on line 4

if __name__ == '__main__':

When I run this code, I get the following response:

==================== FAILURES =====================
----------------- test_gonna_fail -----------------

    def test_gonna_fail():
>       assert True == False
E       assert True == False

samples.py:4: AssertionError
======== 1 failed, 0 passed in 0.1 seconds ========

As you can see, pytest identified where the assert statement failed on line 4 and displays exactly caused the failure (True did not equal False). Very nice indeed.

What's Next?

In my next blog post I describe the following features of writing tests with pytest.

  • The raises context manager
  • Fixtures
  • Fixture Teardown

Tags: python django testing
← Back to home